Miles and Huberman's Evaluative Criteria
Objectivity/Confirmability - relative neutrality, freedom from unacknowledged researcher bias, explicitness about inevitable bias
Reliability/Dependability/Auditability is the process of the study consistent and reasonably stable over time and across researchers and methods? (Miles and Huberman, 1994, p. 278):
Internal Validity/Credibility/Authenticity - Truth value. Do the findings of the study make sense? Are they credible to the people studied, members of the research community, and others?
External Validity/Transferability/Fittingness - Do the conclusions of a study have any larger import? Are they transferable to other contexts? Do they fit with what we already know? How far can findings be generalized?
Utilization/Application/Action Orientation - What does the study do for participants? What is the pragmatic value of the research?
For a list of specific questions that one should ask to evaluate the quality of a research study based on each of the above criteria, please see Miles and Huberman (1994, pp. 278-280).
Miles, MB. & Huberman, AM. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
click here to return to Evaluative Criteria